Overview
Comment: | Some notes from Axel for simplifying the presentation. |
---|---|
Downloads: | Tarball | ZIP archive | SQL archive |
Timelines: | family | ancestors | descendants | both | trunk |
Files: | files | file ages | folders |
SHA1: |
8bc1c13885ca25dfb82238b1716253b7 |
User & Date: | ivan on 2012-10-07 14:21:17 |
Other Links: | manifest | tags |
Context
2012-10-07
| ||
18:06 | Applied some suggestions by Axel. check-in: 29ee45c594 user: ivan tags: trunk | |
14:21 | Some notes from Axel for simplifying the presentation. check-in: 8bc1c13885 user: ivan tags: trunk | |
2012-09-28
| ||
09:46 | Argh, forgot to include FIRE name with logo. check-in: 896dcfe009 user: ivan tags: trunk, cnbub-2012-1.0.4 | |
Changes
Modified script.txt from [777bb9d984] to [63bbd39286].
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 .. 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 .. 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 ... 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 ... 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 ... 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 |
supporting NGOs) OPLAN Foundation, Pangea. *##* - Objective: Provide a testbed and associated tools and knowledge for researchers to experiment on real community networks. *##* ** Testbed? - Environment built with real hardware for realistic experimental research on network technologies. *##* - Some wireless testbeds, both indoor and outdoor. - Problems: their limited local scale, their unrealistic controlled environment, experiments can't share resources simultaneously. - Internet: PlanetLab, planet-scale testbed with resource sharing on nodes. Main inspiration for Community-Lab. *##* ** Community-Lab: a testbed for community networks - Community-Lab is the testbed developed by CONFINE. - Integrates and extends the participating community networks. - Using the FEDERICA research backbone for interconnection. *##* - All Community-Lab's software and documentation is “free as in freedom” so people can use it to setup their own CONFINE testbed. * Requirements and challenges A testbed has requirements that are challenged by the unique characteristics of CNs. For instance, how to *##* ** Simple management vs. Distributed node ownership - manage devices belonging to diverse owners? *##* ................................................................................ - support testbed spanning different CNs? *##* * Community-Lab testbed architecture ** Overall architecture This is the architecture developed by the CONFINE project to handle the previous challenges. It applies to all testbeds using CONFINE software. *##* - A testbed consists of a set of nodes managed by the same server. *##* - Server managed by testbed admins. - Network and nodes managed by CN members. - Node admins must adhere to testbed terms and conditions. - This decouples testbed management from infrastructure ownership & mgmt. *##* - Testbed management traffic uses a tinc mesh VPN: - Avoids problems with firewalls and private networks in nodes. ................................................................................ - They help extend it over multiple CNs by external means (e.g. FEDERICA, the Internet). - They can also route the management network to the Internet. *##* - Researchers run experiments in slices spread over several nodes (as slivers). *##* ** Slices, slivers and nodes - These concepts are inspired in PlanetLab. - A slice is a management concept that groups a set of related slivers. - A sliver holds the resources (CPU, memory, disk, bandwidth, interfaces…) allocated for a slice in a given node. - A node hosts several slivers at the same time. *##* ** Node architecture allows the realization of these concepts. *##* A node consists of a CD, a RD and a rD connected to the same wired local network. *##* - The community device - Completely normal CN device, so existing ones can be used. - routes traffic between the CN and the local network (which runs no routing protocol). *##* ................................................................................ isolation and node stability. - uses traffic control, filtering and anonymization to ensure network stability, isolation and privacy (partialy implemented). *##* - The recovery device (not implemented) can force a remote hardware reboot of the RD in case it hangs. It also helps with upgrade and recovery. *##* * Experiments support Researchers can configure slivers with different types of network interfaces depending on the connectivity needs of experiments. For instance, to *##* - mimic a home PC: use the private interface, *##* which has L3 traffic forwarded using NAT to the CN but filtered to ensure network stability. *##* - implement a network service: create a public interface, *##* which has a CN address and L3 traffic routed directly to the CN but filtered to ensure ................................................................................ through an API that can be used to study the testbed itself, or to implement external services like node monitoring and selection. ** An example experiment to show how the testbed works. We'll create two slivers which ping each other. *##* 1. The researcher first contacts the server and registers a slice description which specifies a template for slivers (e.g. Debian Squeeze) and includes data and programs to setup slivers and run experiments. *##* 2. This and all subsequent changes performed by the researcher are stored in the registry, which holds the config of all components in the testbed. *##* 3. The researcher chooses two nodes and registers sliver descriptions for them in the previous slice. Each one includes a public interface to the CN. ................................................................................ This is a summary of all the previous steps. *##* * Cooperation between community networks and Community-Lab can take different forms. Given a typical CN like this, with most nodes linked using cheap and ubiquitous WiFi technology: *##* - CN members can provide an existing CD and let CONFINE connect a RD to it via Ethernet. Experiments are restricted to the application layer unless the node owner allows the RD to include a direct interface (i.e. antenna). *##* - CN members can provide a location and let CONFINE set up a complete node there (CD and RD). In this way CONFINE helps extend the CN. *##* - CONFINE can also extend the CN by setting up a physically separated cloud of connected nodes. Experiments in all layers are possible in this setup, but |
> > > > > > > > > > |
26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 .. 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 ... 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ... 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 ... 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 |
supporting NGOs) OPLAN Foundation, Pangea. *##* - Objective: Provide a testbed and associated tools and knowledge for researchers to experiment on real community networks. *##* ** Testbed? - Environment built with real hardware for realistic experimental research on network technologies. *##* # Axel: Insert headline "Examples of existing testbeds". - Some wireless testbeds, both indoor and outdoor. - Problems: their limited local scale, their unrealistic controlled environment, experiments can't share resources simultaneously. - Internet: PlanetLab, planet-scale testbed with resource sharing on nodes. Main inspiration for Community-Lab. *##* ** Community-Lab: a testbed for community networks - Community-Lab is the testbed developed by CONFINE. - Integrates and extends the participating community networks. - Using the FEDERICA research backbone for interconnection. *##* - All Community-Lab's software and documentation is “free as in freedom” so people can use it to setup their own CONFINE testbed. # Axel: Headline: for what? * Requirements and challenges A testbed has requirements that are challenged by the unique characteristics of CNs. For instance, how to *##* ** Simple management vs. Distributed node ownership - manage devices belonging to diverse owners? *##* ................................................................................ - support testbed spanning different CNs? *##* * Community-Lab testbed architecture ** Overall architecture This is the architecture developed by the CONFINE project to handle the previous challenges. It applies to all testbeds using CONFINE software. *##* # Axel: Introduce scenario: CNs, nodes, admins. # Ivan: Don't zoom. - A testbed consists of a set of nodes managed by the same server. *##* - Server managed by testbed admins. - Network and nodes managed by CN members. - Node admins must adhere to testbed terms and conditions. - This decouples testbed management from infrastructure ownership & mgmt. *##* - Testbed management traffic uses a tinc mesh VPN: - Avoids problems with firewalls and private networks in nodes. ................................................................................ - They help extend it over multiple CNs by external means (e.g. FEDERICA, the Internet). - They can also route the management network to the Internet. *##* - Researchers run experiments in slices spread over several nodes (as slivers). *##* ** Slices, slivers and nodes # Axel: Reverse, from PoV of researcher: select nodes, run as slivers, gruop in slices. - These concepts are inspired in PlanetLab. - A slice is a management concept that groups a set of related slivers. - A sliver holds the resources (CPU, memory, disk, bandwidth, interfaces…) allocated for a slice in a given node. - A node hosts several slivers at the same time. *##* ** Node architecture # Axel: More stress on node itself. # Ivan: Don't zoom!! allows the realization of these concepts. *##* A node consists of a CD, a RD and a rD connected to the same wired local network. *##* - The community device - Completely normal CN device, so existing ones can be used. - routes traffic between the CN and the local network (which runs no routing protocol). *##* ................................................................................ isolation and node stability. - uses traffic control, filtering and anonymization to ensure network stability, isolation and privacy (partialy implemented). *##* - The recovery device (not implemented) can force a remote hardware reboot of the RD in case it hangs. It also helps with upgrade and recovery. *##* * Experiments support # Axel: Turn around as of mail: from PoV of researcher: 1) testbed through API, choose nodes, 2) login OoB, 3) auto creation, 4) specific interfaces. Researchers can configure slivers with different types of network interfaces depending on the connectivity needs of experiments. For instance, to *##* - mimic a home PC: use the private interface, *##* which has L3 traffic forwarded using NAT to the CN but filtered to ensure network stability. *##* - implement a network service: create a public interface, *##* which has a CN address and L3 traffic routed directly to the CN but filtered to ensure ................................................................................ through an API that can be used to study the testbed itself, or to implement external services like node monitoring and selection. ** An example experiment to show how the testbed works. We'll create two slivers which ping each other. *##* # Use summary diagram, maybe colorise labels. 1. The researcher first contacts the server and registers a slice description which specifies a template for slivers (e.g. Debian Squeeze) and includes data and programs to setup slivers and run experiments. *##* 2. This and all subsequent changes performed by the researcher are stored in the registry, which holds the config of all components in the testbed. *##* 3. The researcher chooses two nodes and registers sliver descriptions for them in the previous slice. Each one includes a public interface to the CN. ................................................................................ This is a summary of all the previous steps. *##* * Cooperation between community networks and Community-Lab can take different forms. Given a typical CN like this, with most nodes linked using cheap and ubiquitous WiFi technology: *##* # Axel: Keep CN on sight, explain RDs and RD links (DIs) in cloud. - CN members can provide an existing CD and let CONFINE connect a RD to it via Ethernet. Experiments are restricted to the application layer unless the node owner allows the RD to include a direct interface (i.e. antenna). *##* - CN members can provide a location and let CONFINE set up a complete node there (CD and RD). In this way CONFINE helps extend the CN. *##* - CONFINE can also extend the CN by setting up a physically separated cloud of connected nodes. Experiments in all layers are possible in this setup, but |